Weiberose wrote on 03/13/2010 08:54:13 PM:
sparkle,....on rights, I’m talking about our inalienable rights, where do our founders or the men they based our Constitution on say anything about conditions or responsibilities to have those rights? I do believe our only responsibility to those rights is to keep those rights from being taken away.You believe differently, end of discussion.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
Larry, actually this was my post just prior to hers:
sparkle wrote on 03/13/2010 08:40:26 PM:
"Weiberose, On this subject we can agree to respectfully disagree. I believe that "rights" come with responsibilities, and educating the gun owning population on responsible gun ownership by no means interferes with the second amendment. You believe differently, end of discussion."
So I did use the term first. This 2nd amendment crap, and the "pro-life" gun lovers piss me off. Oh the hypocrisy!
Ah, yes, those unmistakable phrases that are hauled out when the going gets a bit tough! LOL
sparkle, certain phrases are etched indelibly in SK's vocabulary, and when we see one, we know that she has outed herself once again.
Yeah, it is fun to throw it back at her though! You all know what a girl crush she has on me! LOL
Yuck :-)
Once upon a time, maybe a couple of years or so ago when there was just the sondrak personality, I happened to engage in a sort of conversation w/ her on one of the O's comment boards. It was quite late at night, and she did not show her claws, interestingly. Even seemed rather vulnerable in her responses when I called her bullshit on her usual "stuff". Wondered at the time if she was drunk.
Any person who's as unhappy as she is, and as self-absorbed as well, has some serious insecurities, and maybe I just hit a weak spot at a weak moment. Haven't seen any indication of that since, however.
People need to realize, Sondra is the very definition of a personality disorder..
She FEEDS off people responding to her..
Best way to piss her off..
IGNORE HER!
Respond to every post around her...but not hers...
It pisses her off to no end...
As I often say, hit the "ignore button"
Sparkle and sidrat, I totally agree w/ you both. That one time I did find myself engaged w/ her in discourse happened accidentally, on my part anyway.
Another possibility to be considered is that she's reached a certain age and has hormone imbalance issues. Estrogen dominance is fairly common in US women over 40, and I've known some who had serious PMS type moods, even anxiety attacks, that were completely smoothed out by using progesterone. Or, if she really is 29, as she stated once or twice, then maybe she's had a total hysterectomy. Apparently, she doesn't have children, which is probably a good thing.
With individuals like her and IV, the biggest concern in my mind is the people who have to be in contact w/ them on a daily basis, like family members. They seem to be quite toxic personalities, and I doubt if posting on the O's comment boards is a sufficient release of their venom to make them pleasant to live with, but it could be a help. So, I figure they can let loose all they want there, but I'm going to try not to step in any of it.
Even a hysterectomy couldn't stop her from the evilmmaculate conception.
Geez, Lost, you almost made me drop my piece of sesame chicken! ROTFLMAO
(BTW, what's your kitty's call sign?)
Iceman
He was Maverick before..........well, you know.
I assume you're referring to Tom Cruise aka "Maverick" aka the "couch jumper" aka the religious nut? :-)
that and McCain
She's not 29 - late 40s early 50s based on quite few posts. Either that or she got married while in elementary school.
I forgot all about McCain being called Maverick-- that's how memorable he is in my life! LOL
Post a Comment