..................................................................................................................................
Trickle Down Economics is a Pyramid Scheme
By Tina Dupuy, August 31, 2012
A few years ago, I had a friend who didn’t want anyone to know she was
going to therapy. Instead, she would announce at her place of business
she was leaving to attend her Amway meeting. At one point I had to
inform her, “You know that doesn’t make you look any less crazy, right?”
The classic multi-level marketing or pyramid scheme is where one guy
at the top convinces people at the bottom to give the top money. The
hope is the guys in the middle will recruit enough people under them to
move from the middle to the top—hence the pyramid shape. The model is,
clearly, and provably unsustainable. Only a couple of people (those at
the top) do well. Everyone else gets ripped off.
In fairness, Amway, has massaged its methods enough to not qualify as
the illegal type of pyramid scheme. It’s now the more legal type of
pyramid scheme.
But the model—the idea of those at the bottom sacrificing their
retirement benefits (pensions, social security, Medicare etc.) so that
the top tier can pay even less in taxes is what Romney/Ryan are
peddling. Mitt Romney wants to cut taxes for the wealthy. Paul Ryan’s
budget would shrink benefits to give the savings in the form of a tax
cut to the highest brackets. What didn’t work in the Bush years to
strengthen the middle-class (evident by their Lost Decade), they tell us
will work this time! Or as veep-pick also-ran, Senator (R-FL) Marco
Rubio put it, “We have never been a nation of haves and have-nots. We
are a nation of haves and soon-to-haves.”
No, actually, we are a nation of haves and have-nots. We have the
worst wealth inequality of all industrialized nations. Our poverty rate
is the highest in more than 50 years at 15.7 percent. Contrast that with
the top 1 percent of Americans who own nearly half—42 percent of the
nations wealth. Also that same top 1 percent only has 5 percent of the
nation’s debt. So 99 percent of Americans own 58 percent of the pie and
have 95 percent of the debt. We’re fatter, sicker, further in debt and
using the most illegal drugs in the world—all signs Americans have
become overspent from bad economic policies.
But the haves—these demigods of capitalism—won’t trickle their wealth
down to us because of “uncertainty in the market” according to
Republicans. Therefore we bribe them with an even lower tax rate!
Instead of calling it “trickle down” which has been largely panned for decades—the new term is “not punishing success.”
“If your priority in this country is to punish success vote for President Obama,” said the offshore account holder, Mitt Romeny [sic].
If the rich get richer—we’re not getting thinner, healthier, solvent
and off the crack needle. If the rich get richer, the middle-class
doesn’t get more stable.
If the rich get richer, the working poor don’t get pulled out of
poverty. If the rich get richer—they just get richer and park their
money in Luxembourg (where at least their money will be near universal
health care).
We’re actually not a nation of haves at all. Not if you go by a
simple majority—or even a super majority—we’re a nation of have-nots.
Have-nots being sold on a fantasy of wealth trickling down if we’re nice
enough to the haves.
Trickle down economics is a pyramid scheme: It’s the rich telling us
if we just recruit others to believe in the con then we will become the
rich too.
It’s a lie.
..................................................................................................................................
Monday, September 3, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment