"By the time the 2016 election arrives, Obamacare bashers may have an even tougher time making the case against the law."

...................................................................................................................................................................
COMMENTS:
*  The only people who didnt like it were the 1% cause their taxes were raised to pay for it. Thats the truth and all the other arguments were just propoganda drummed up by the 1% cause no one would care if they came out and said we dont like cause it raised our taxes. Wealth buys you the ability to influence public opinion and buy the media off. Amazing that no one in the media ever brought this up.
*  what were these "fears"? What was they basis for them?  Answer: The fears were based on political opposition, not on reality. Obamacare is a helpful program that has met its objectives. The people who generated all the "fear" and FUD never offered an alternative (a tax credit? Thats gonna help me when I have cancer and my insurance company drops me???). Cunning opportunists like Ted Cruz are now healthcare obtained via ObamaCare.
*  Oh yes Republicans, lets go back to enabling profit-care insurance companies to cherry pick who gets healthcare and who doesn't based on who's profitable and who is not. A profit-care system is not a health-care system. Its the fleecing of Americans!
*  What is truly amazing is that with all the giant brainpower in the Republican Party, they don't have a lawyer that can overturn it.
*  Let’s get something straight, up until now America has never had a healthcare system. We've had an ER urgent-care/profit-care system which enables these supposed "health insurance companies" to fleece accommodating Americans. What is their value-add? They begrudgingly write checks to doctors and hospitals and deny coverage or procedures wherever they can in order to ensure profits to their shareholders and big fat salaries for themselves (the highest paid of any industry).
...................................................................................................................................................................
Employers shrug off Obamacare, robbing Republicans of a campaign issue
By Rick Newman, May 6, 2015

Just 18 months ago, a Republican fantasy seemed about to come true.

The Affordable Care Act was in the midst of a disastrous rollout plagued by dialup-stye technology snafus. President Obama had sabotaged his own health-reform plan by falsely promising that everybody happy with their health plan could keep it. As frozen computer screens and canceled policies generated a tsunami of bad publicity, it seemed plausible that Obamacare might be such a flop that voters would clamor for its repeal when the next presidential election came around.

Now, with the next presidential election underway, nothing of the sort is happening. The problems that marred the rollout of Obamacare have been fixed. The law, meanwhile, is reducing the number of Americans who lack health coverage as intended, as a new report from the Rand Corp. shows. And just as important, many unintended consequences that critics of the law predicted have failed to materialize.

"The American people don’t live in the ACA bubble,” Drew Altman, CEO of the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation, wrote recently. “It is striking how divorced the overall public’s top priorities are from the continued political wrangling over the Affordable Care Act.”

Most of the Republican presidential candidates (both declared and presumed to be running) have voiced strong opposition to the ACA and promised to make it a top campaign issue. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush calls it a “monstrosity” and says the government should replace it with stripped-down coverage that’s more “consumer-directed.” Sen. Marco Rubio wants to repeal Obamacare, even though it covers 1.6 million people in his home state of Florida. Ben Carson, a retired neurosurgeon, got his start as a Tea Party favorite by ranting against Obamacare and claiming that it’s “the worst thing that has happened in this country since slavery.”

But Americans are warming to the controversial program. A recent Gallup poll shows a sharp rise in public approval of how the government handles healthcare, from 29% in 2013 to 43% today. By the time the 2016 election arrives, Obamacare bashers may have an even tougher time making the case against the law. Here’s why:

“Socalized medicine” hasn’t materialized. One big concern about the ACA was the possibility it would undermine the current system of employer-provided health insurance and lead to a market in which the government is the dominant provider of healthcare. There’s no sign of that happening. The Rand study, in fact, finds that the number of people with insurance provided by their employer rose by 8 million between 2013 and early 2015, as the chart below shows. That gain exceeds the number of jobs created during that time, suggesting that some people who could have gotten coverage through their employer before but didn't have changed their minds and signed up, since the law now requires them to have coverage. If anything, that strengthens the system of employer-sponsored insurance, which is how 60% of non-elderly Americans get their coverage.


Source: Rand Corp.

Obamacare hasn’t killed jobs. Republicans repeatedly lambasted Obamacare as a “job killer,” but it doesn’t seem to be that, either. Since the law fully took effect at the beginning of 2014, employers have created about 3.5 million new jobs, a very strong pace of job growth comparable with the late 1990s. The Gallup job-creation index, meanwhile, recently hit the highest levels since 2008. It's unlikely Obamacare is directly contributing to job growth, but it sure doesen’t seem to be harming it.

The law has helped the uninsured. The number of non-elderly adults who lack insurance has plunged from 42.7 million right before Obamacare went into effect to 25.8 million now, according to Rand. That’s an extra 16.9 million Americans who have gained coverage in less than 2 years.

There aren’t that many people negatively affected by the law. If Obama were to get a do-over on the ACA, one thing he’d probably change is the provision requiring every policy to cover a minimum set of services, which led to the widespread cancellation of certain types of policies and the repudiation of Obama’s own claim about everybody being able to keep their insurance plan if they wanted to. But the total number of people who lost coverage has turned out to be smaller than the huge controversy may have suggested.

The Rand study found that the number of people with “nongroup” coverage—plans purchased individually from an insurer, rather than provided through an employer—dropped by 1.9 million between 2013 and 2015. At least some of those, and possibly most, were policies canceled against the policyholder’s wishes because the plan failed to meet minimum coverage requirements. The harm done to nongroup policyholders, in the name of helping others, is a notable and unnecessary flaw of the ACA. But 1.9 million policyholders is only 1.1% of all non-elderly adults with insurance. There won’t be a lot of voters going to the polls on Election Day in 2106 who lost insurance because of Obamacare.

There are still plenty of problems with the ACA and with the U.S. healthcare system overall. Costs are still rising faster than inflation, with a growing portion of many families’ disposable income going toward healthcare instead of rent, food, education or savings. While the cost of premiums has flattened out, the cost of deductibles, co-pays and other out-of-pocket expenses has soared. The Affordable Care Act remains a misnomer, because healthcare remains far from affordable for many families.

Obamacare also faces a serious Supreme Court challenge in a case known as King v. Burwell, with the justices due to issue a ruling in June. If they side with the plaintiffs, the law will become invalid in 34 states and will basically cease to function. Nobody knows how the justices will rule, but striking down key provisions of the law would suddenly make healthcare a top issue in the presidential campaign once again.

If the ACA survives the Supreme Court, on the other hand, legal challenges to its existence may wind down, and negative publicity could finally subside. And Republicans may need to find something else to get voters fired up about.
...................................................................................................................................................................