"The propaganda ISIS puts online is a threat. But wholesale censorship is not the answer." Got that, Barton?

...................................................................................................................................................................
COMMENTS: 
*  I just love how the 2nd Amendment is untouchable, context-agnostic gospel to these slack-jawed yokels, but the 1st Amendment is treated as a mere annoyance that can and should be gutted at their whim.
*  So you want a de facto Meritocracy? I’m not so sure about that. However, I am sure that we the people could also, you know, simply elect leaders who aren’t complete idiots and stop electing people based on how loud they can shout. The problem isn’t that somehow stupid people are somehow mysteriously getting into Congress. The problem is we the voters put them in office.
*  Good on FCC for pushing back, as they should. An equal problem is when people want to ban mere association with a dangerous group. Freedom of association is also protected by the First Amendment, even association with murderous dirtbag assholes. Now, you can’t actually do anything to support said homicidal fuckwits other than post on FB that you like the group or some other inane action, but you can’t just criminalize membership.
*  Most Congressmen Do Not Understand How the Internet or the First Amendment Work That is what the real headline should be. 
    *  This Congressman Doesn’t Understand How the Internet or the First Amendment Work Anything, Really.  It is Joe Barton we’re talking about, so...
*   And these people were elected to run our country. Gg American voters!  I was annoyed by all the “ISIS used the PS4 to plan attacks!” headlines that were abound yesterday. Like, so what? Yeah they’re absolutely deplorable people, but they’re still people (genetically...), so they likely use technology to communicate. Just like everyone else.
...................................................................................................................................................................
This Congressman Doesn't Understand How the Internet or the First Amendment Work
By Kate Knibbs, November 17, 2015

Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) has a plan to stop ISIS today at a Federal Communications Committee hearing: Censor the internet.

Here’s what Barton proposed today during an FCC hearing:

“ISIS and the terrorist networks can’t beat us militarily, but they are really trying to use the internet and all of the social media to try to intimidate us and beat us psychologically[…] Isn’t there something we can do under existing law to shut those internet sites down? I know they pop up like weeds, but once they do pop up, shut them down, and turn those appropriate internet addresses over to proper law enforcement to try and shut them down.”

“I’m not sure our authority extends to picking and choosing amongst websites,” FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler responded, stating the extremely obvious. Barton then asked if there was a way Congress could grant the government authority to shut ISIS websites down.

Wheeler pivoted, noting that the government needed to focus on the security of its networks, but Barton wouldn’t let it go. “They’re using the internet in an extremely offensive, inappropriate way against us, and we ought to be able to make it at a minimum much more difficult, and hopefully absolutely shut it down,” Barton continued.

This is how deeply some members of Congress misunderstand the internet.

It’s true that social media platforms have not succeeded in preventing ISIS from using them as distribution channels for propaganda, and it’s scary. But giving the government authority to shut down websites when it doesn’t like the speech happening on them would eviscerate the First Amendment.

There’s a very good reason the Federal Trade Commission doesn’t have the authority to shut down individual websites when it doesn’t like them, as the ACLU’s Gabe Rottman told Gizmodo.

“To the extent criminal conduct is occurring on social media, the providers are already self-policing, and rightfully so,” said Rottman, a legislative counsel and policy advisor at the ACLU.

“The First Amendment, however, serves as an important check against the government censoring speech it disagrees with. Congress and the FCC do not and should not have the power to suppress speech, no matter how deplorable, just because the government dislikes the message.”

The propaganda ISIS puts online is a threat. But wholesale censorship is not the answer.
...................................................................................................................................................................