OK, Feds, it's time to indict Trump!! And, Conway, tell #Lyin'Donald it's also not fair to go after what the Clintons did in the '90s either.

...................................................................................................................................................................
COMMENTS: 
*  He wants to talk about Billy boy’s sexcapades. Hell, that’s 20 years old.
*  If this had been Clinton, there would be 9 Congressional investigations into it all. THAT is your double standard.
*  Trump and his brigade of liars just cannot keep up with all of his shady business.
*  There is a minor difference between talking about Clinton in the Nineties and talking about Trump in the Nineties. He wants to talk about the Lewinsky matter in which the worst he can say of Hillary is that she talked trash about Lewinsky, which is certainly legal and given her position quite understandable. One could argue that he is attempting to bring up old, irrelevant garbage having no bearing on her ability to be President. Trump is accused of, and his Ann Coulter look-alike stand-in admits, violating a serious federal law for which one can go to prison. Perhaps the Cinton camp should turn Trump’s words back on him and do a few “lock him up” chants at her rallies.
*  He spent money in Cuba while it was both embargoed and on the STATE SPONSORS OF TERRORISM list. That is high treason. It’s not a question, it’s not a technical violation. It’s treasonous, end of story.
*   We’re talking about Donald Trump having committed a federal crime by spending $68K in Cuba during the embargo. Valleygirl Kellyann Conway is great at deflecting, but she admitted that he did this, and it’s a serious crime. Why is it that Bill’s affairs from that period are subject to discussion by the Trump campaign, but Trump’s federal crime from the same period should be off-limits. Thank goodness The View didn’t buy this nonsense.
...................................................................................................................................................................
Trump’s campaign manager accidentally admits Trump broke the law on live TV
Conway complains it’s not fair to go back to 1998.
By Josh Israel, September 29, 2016

Donald Trump’s campaign manager appeared to unwittingly confirm an explosive Newsweek story on Thursday, telling ABC’s The View that a Trump company did indeed spend money in Cuba in 1998, in violation of a longstanding U.S. embargo that Trump has vociferously defended.

Newsweek’s Kurt Eichenwald reported on Thursday that Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts spent at least $68,000 in 1998 in Cuba, “at a time when the corporate expenditure of even a penny in the Caribbean country was prohibited without U.S. government approval.” The story notes that “with Trump’s knowledge, executives funneled the cash for the Cuba trip through an American consulting firm.” After the consultants traveled to Cuba and spent the funds, the consultants instructed Trump’s company on “how to make it appear legal by linking it after the fact to a charitable effort.”

Asked about the report, Conway first tried to defend Trump by pointing out that the company ultimately decided not to invest in Cuba and therefore was “not treasonous.”

“Read the entire story. It starts out with a screaming headline, as it usually does, that he did business in Cuba. And then it turns out he decided not to invest there.”

Asked if she was denying that they spent the funds, she conceded: “I think they paid money, as I understand from the story, they paid money in 1998.” Conway then attempted to claim a double standard, “We’re not supposed to talk about years ago when it comes to the Clinton, but with Trump, there is no statute of limitations ever.”

Conway then noted that Trump has been “very critical of Cuba” and gave a speech to the Cuban American National Foundation in Miami “critical of those who want to do business with Castro” a year later.

Watch:


Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), who has endorsed Trump after losing the Republican nomination to the millionaire real estate investor, said on Thursday that the allegations are “very serious and troubling” and called on Trump’s campaign to answer the questions raised by the report.

UPDATE: BuzzFeed’s Kyle Blaine reported on Thursday afternoon that the Trump campaign distributed talking points to surrogates urging them to dismiss Eichenwald as a “totally discredited reporter” with “manufactured reports,” to dismiss this and other reports as “being from “10, 20, or even 30 years” back, and to change the subject to the Clinton’s “special interest donors.”

Eichenwald responded with a Tweet noting that the Trump campaign still has not addressed the allegations.

Soon after, on MSNBC, Trump surrogate Steve Cortes acknowledged much of Eichenwald’s report, but argued, “If this was a violation, I think it was an incredibly technical one” and “if he had a technical violation there, I don’t think we can really fault him much for that.”
...................................................................................................................................................................