C'mon, Senators, do your jobs!! No more stonewalling.

...................................................................................................................................................................
COMMENTS: 
*  Republicans after Scalia dies: "No confirmation of Obama's picks. Let's let the people decide." (Even though we did...in 2012).  Republicans after it's clearly apparent that Hillary Clinton is the next President: "No confirmation of Clinton's picks. Let's let the people decide in 2020."  Ridiculous. Aren't you embarrassed by this yet? This can't possibly be what you want in government, can it? Our way or the highway? What country do you people think this is?
*  After a good hard look at Trump, the decision to vote for Clinton is one of the easiest I'll ever make.
*  McCain needs to go home, lie down, and take a long nap at one his 8 homes.
    *  He was a good man once. Then Palin spiked his prune juice.
*  Pence is almost as bad a liar as Trump.
*   You call enacting over a hundred amendments being 'shut out' of the process? Of course no repub voted for their OWN plan. Their main object was to oppose whatever Obama supported, even if it was their OWN plan. The repubs would rather hurt the country than have Obama succeed. What traitors the repubs are.
...................................................................................................................................................................
Top Republican: Senate can't 'stonewall' Clinton Supreme Court nominee
By Jordain Carney, October 18, 2016

Sen. Chuck Grassley said Tuesday the Senate cannot "stonewall" a potential Supreme Court nomination from Hillary Clinton, roughly a day after a GOP colleague pledged united opposition.

"We will very clearly vet, and then once that's done we will make a decision whether we will vote for or against, but ... if that new president happens to be Hillary we can't just simply stonewall," the Iowa Republican told reporters on a conference call, which was published by Radio Iowa.

Grassley, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, added that, based on this cycle's second presidential debate, he expects Clinton to nominate "judicial activists." But he said senators will examine any nominee sent to the Senate.

"We have the same responsibility for [Donald] Trump. We know more the type of people Trump would nominate because he’s listed 20," Grassley told reporters during the call. "They fall more into the category of strict constructionists.”

If Republicans maintain control of the Senate and Grassley keeps his post on the committee, he will be responsible for giving a Clinton or Trump nominee a hearing and initial vote.

Grassley's comments come a day after Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who is not a member of the Judiciary panel, told a Philadelphia radio station that Senate Republicans would be "united against" a Clinton Supreme Court nominee. 

McCain's staff later walked back his comments, saying that he would examine any nominee before deciding how he would vote. Grassley called the modification "the right thing to do." 

But the Arizona Republican's comments sparked criticism from some Democrats and outside groups that Republicans would refuse to take up a Supreme Court nominee if Democrats keep control of the White House in 2017.

Republicans have refused to take up President Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland, arguing the Senate shouldn't take up a nomination during an election year and that the next president should be able to fill the vacancy created by Justice Antonin Scalia's death in February.

Democrats hounded Grassley over the decision and hoped the Supreme Court would make him vulnerable as he seeks a seventh term. But Grassley is expected to win his reelection bid. He is currently leading Democratic challenger Patty Judge by roughly 15 percent, according to RealClearPolitics.
...................................................................................................................................................................