To Participate on Thurstonblog

email yyyyyyyyyy58@gmail.com, provide profile information and we'll email your electronic membership


Thursday, June 4, 2015

"... congressional Republicans haven't been rushing to update the Voting Rights Act, which the Supreme Court gutted in 2013 ..." Of course they haven't!

...................................................................................................................................................................
COMMENTS: 
*  ... illegals are voting? Since when? You still have to be a REGISTERED voter to vote, did these illegals browse the phone book to find a name to steal?  Just more rubbish. There is no voter fraud, unless you consider the tampering of electronic voting machines by the people who make them?
*  Efforts to stymie voting rights are, well, just unAmerican and it's the stinking GOP, as usual, trying to limit the rights of citizens except, of course, for second amendment rights as they would like to see everyone kill each other then they could do the pipeline and keep all the money for themselves which they were going to do anyway.
*  In the history of this country, there's never been a demonstrated problem of illegals voting. Since when did the American philosophy of voting be the most important thing a citizen can do, change to a philosophy that its better to deny a million citizens the right to vote in order to prevent one illegal from voting. This isn't what I served 20 years in the military to defend.
*  But....but....how can conservatives win any elections without limiting voting rights? This is clearly not fair to all those people out there who cling to their tired regressive social and political philosophy of conservatism. Hopefully the Hopeless 5 on the Supreme Court can remedy this atrocity and restore and affirm conservatives' right to cheat and scam their way into office.
*  Texas' voter ID law, which some consider the nation's strictest, is currently being considered by a federal appeals court and is likely to end up before the Supreme Court.  ****************************************************  And the REAL AND ONLY reason for such laws that purport to prevent voter fraud was expressed most vividly two years ago.  “I’m going to be real honest with you,” Tea Party leader Ken Emanuelson said at a Dallas County Republican Party event on May 20 (2013). “The Republican Party doesn’t want black people to vote if they are going to vote 9-to-1 for Democrats.”  There IS voter fraud, but it is committed UPON voters, not BY voters.
   *  And the Supreme Court will once again say if there's a problem, let Congress fix it, knowing full well that Republicans will never bring anything to the floor.
...................................................................................................................................................................
Attempts To Limit Voting Rights Stunted As Efforts To Enhance Voting Access Prevail
By Samantha Lachman, June 3, 2015

A number of state legislatures are adjourning, and supporters of expanded access to the ballot box may be sighing in relief as they see some of the major efforts to restrict voting access were stymied during this legislative session.

Then again, they may be disappointed that bills to restore voting rights to felons were squashed, or that courts haven't yet shut down strict new voter identification requirements in Arizona, North Carolina and Texas.

At the federal level, congressional Republicans haven't been rushing to update the Voting Rights Act, which the Supreme Court gutted in 2013, even as they celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Selma, Alabama, civil rights march that helped bring about the landmark law.

As the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University highlighted Wednesday, "For the third year in a row, bills to expand voters’ access to the ballot box outpace those to restrict voting, both in terms of introduction and enactment." Of course, as the center notes, restrictions passed since the wave that swept the GOP to power in a slew of state legislatures in 2010 have continued to limit voting rights.

Here's a look back at state-level efforts to expand and restrict access to the ballot since November's midterm elections.

Efforts To Restrict Voting Access

Over the past four years, it has been challenging to keep up with all the new voter ID laws put in place. Although voter identification restrictions remained a favorite project of Republican-controlled state governments in their latest legislative sessions, only one -- North Dakota -- succeeded in passing a voter ID bill this time around. That measure made North Dakota's already strict voter ID law even more stringent.

Nevada's GOP-led legislature, which was considered the most likely state to enact a voter ID bill this year, closed its legislative session Tuesday without passing a law that would require a government-issued photo ID to vote. Arkansas and Missouri, where state courts struck down their ID laws, failed to put ID requirements before voters as ballot questions. Voter ID bills also failed in Maine, Nebraska and New Mexico.

Efforts To Enhance Voting Access

Both Illinois and Vermont passed bills allowing for same-day voter registration. Fourteen states now allow their citizens to register and vote on Election Day.

Oregon Gov. Kate Brown (D) signed a bill making the state the first to have "universal registration," where eligible voters will automatically be registered using state Department of Motor Vehicles data. An estimated 300,000 new voters will be added to the rolls.

Other states trended toward online voter registration, as Florida, New Mexico and Oklahoma decided to adopt the easier, more cost-efficient system. Lawmakers in Kentucky and Pennsylvania are also trying to do so, though with less success (so far). More than 20 states now have some form of online registration.

State legislators displayed a renewed enthusiasm for restoring felons' voting rights, though those efforts didn't always lead to success. Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R) vetoed a bill passed out of his state's legislature. A similar attempt in Minnesota's Legislature didn't survive, but is expected to be pushed again next year. Wyoming, however, did make its restoration process for felons easier.

Texas' voter ID law, which some consider the nation's strictest, is currently being considered by a federal appeals court and is likely to end up before the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, the state enacted a law that would provide a certified copy of a state birth certificate for free if voters state they would use it to obtain an election identification certificate. Voting rights advocates had called Texas' government-issued photo ID requirement a "poll tax" since the 2011 bill did not make birth certificates free for those who don't have one.
...................................................................................................................................................................

No comments: