"... for the good of the party, and the country, some of the hangers-on need to leave the field." But..... all of them are "hangers-on"!

...................................................................................................................................................................

COMMENTS: 
*  The question isn't so interesting as the high probability that Trump will certainly go last. He's good at ramping up interest in "his brand," but he behaves like one who couldn't tolerate the reality of being an American President. I think this goes to show how deeply narcissistic and cynical he is, finally.
*  Jindal come back home so we can roast you and not in a funny way you sorry joke!
*  Trump has done to the GOP in 3months ..what the DNC has been trying to do for 30 years.
*  most of these candidates know they have no chance - they were never there for anything but self promotion.
*  None of them have a ghost of a chance of winning the national election, and from their outlandish positions and ridiculous statements they reveal that they more then anyone know this. I don’t know nor do I care what their real motivation might be. The real action and fun is watching the Jeb, Jethro,Ellie May , Granny fringe of the republican party......That’s where you get real entertainment worth the price of admission.
*  I hope none of them drop out. The free entertainment value of watching the GOP implode is priceleess.
...................................................................................................................................................................
With Rick Perry Out, the Culling of the GOP Herd Begins—Here’s Who’s Next
By Liz Peek, September 14, 2015

Now there are sixteen, for which we give hearty thanks to former Texas Governor Rick Perry. Let us hope Mr. Perry’s resignation from the GOP primary race inspires others to follow suit.  

Next Wednesday, contenders for the Republican nomination will again gather to joust on two separate debate stages, each hoping to break through and win some points, like saplings competing for sunlight. The Republican field, rich in talent and accomplishment, is struggling to be heard, overshadowed by the outsized personality and celebrity of Donald Trump.

The serious candidates – those who have solid backing and a hope of winning – are dwarfed by having to squeeze onto an overpopulated stage and wave their arms for attention, literally and figuratively. They need a chance to make their case to voters, to talk about policy, explain their vision. Not just during the debates, but on the airwaves. Under current circumstances, with The Donald sucking up more than his share of the limelight that is almost impossible.

Here’s what Republicans across the country should demand: by the time of the next debate, scheduled for October 28 in Colorado, there is but one debate stage, and fewer contestants. It is time for the most marginal candidates to bow out.

George Pataki, for instance, should withdraw from the field. The former New York Governor, who last held public office a decade ago, has been out of the game for too long, and has failed to get traction. Even his friends privately concede that his run aims to beef up his visibility and his law practice, as opposed to win the nomination. Shortly after he launched his bid in May Pataki rallied some support in New York State, polling at 11 percent along with Marco Rubio, but he has been invisible nationally. The latest Real Clear Politics polls of 15 GOP candidates don’t even include Pataki. The most recent Quinnipiac poll has him under one percent.

Also vanished from the polls is Jim Gilmore. The former Virginia Governor launched his run via video in July, but has yet to hold a campaign event or boost his presence via social media. His standing is so nonexistent that he will not be invited to participate in next week’s second-tier debate.

Those two are easy to dismiss. Others who should withdraw will likely take more convincing. On the basis of today’s polling, Lindsay Graham is facing ultra-long odds. (A prominent London bookmaker places his chance of winning the nomination at 66 to 1, only slightly worse than John McCain, who isn’t running). A recent survey of GOP primary voters in his home state of South Carolina showed that 78 percent think Graham should drop out of the race – and that’s his power base.

Worse for him, his candidacy appears to have soured voters on his performance in the Senate. A recent poll shows only 36 percent of voters in his state give him high marks, compared to 51 percent who disapprove. Last February, the same poll showed Mr. Graham with 54 percent of respondents scoring his performance well compared to 29 percent who gave him thumbs down.

It isn’t only about the polling. It’s still a long time until February, when voters in Iowa and New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina will pick their favorites. Famously, at this point in the 2012 race, Rick Perry led the field with 32 percent of the vote. A month later Newt Gingrich was out in front, with 35 percent, followed by an unlikely surge by Rick Santorum.

Polls can turn around; they are volatile.  However, a candidate needs a distinctive message, substantial funding and a solid base of supporters to carry them through this exhaustive process. Graham has none of those things. His message is bleak, focusing mainly on sending troops into battle in Syria and reforming (cutting) Social Security and Medicare – not exactly the stuff of dreams. Advice to Graham: get out while you can with your dignity intact.

Others who appear to face long odds include Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, currently polling below 1 percent, and Rick Santorum, who is buried in the polls and running low on funds. Those same issues bedeviled Rick Perry, who just recently pulled out of the race. Despite having raised significant funds through his Super Pac, Perry’s campaign had money trouble; his staff hadn’t been paid in weeks and his organization had just shut down their South Carolina office. Also, he lacked a clear message.

Perry’s authoritative view of border security had been blown away by The Donald, who has run roughshod over the immigration issue. Rand Paul is a candidate who will forever eke out a particular slice of the electorate -- people alarmed by government snooping and military interventions -- but he is not going to be the candidate. Political neophyte Carly Fiorina is unlikely to be the standard-bearer either, though she is smart and powerful on the stump.

Some of these folks are prepping for the next round, or trying to build a career, or putting themselves forward as a VP candidate (Fiorina.) At the end, there are only a few with the potential to go the distance, and we could be surprised. But, for the good of the party, and the country, some of the hangers-on need to leave the field.
...................................................................................................................................................................