Carly touted "her failed 2010 Senate campaign".... wow, that's some kind of point, isn't it?

...................................................................................................................................................................
COMMENTS:
*  Because her lack of political experience beats the heck out of the rest of the occupants of the clown car who have political experience.
*  Not sure about Fiorina.  But I don't think business experience is a minus at all. And lack of political experience could be a plus.  All these people on both sides, who somehow have become filthy rich by working in government are the problem. The so called "experienced" ones.
*  Better question: Isn’t it questionable to take someone with no political experience and disastrous business experience and make them President of the United States?  Follow-up question: you talk about championing average Americans yet you robbed more than 30,000 of their livelihood and still collapsed your company. How was that in the best interest of "the little guy?"
*  The US has had several presidents without political experience. Imagine Ulysses Grant running for president after losing the Battle of Gettysburg and being removed as general of the Union Army. Or imagine Eisenhower seeking the presidency after leading the allies to defeat on D-Day and being fired as a result. Then you'd have Carly Fiorina.
*  The only reason this woman isn't a politician right now is because she couldn't get elected.
...................................................................................................................................................................
Wallace Grills Fiorina: Why Should People Elect Someone with ‘No Political Experience’?
By Josh Feldman, May 31, 2015

Chris Wallace challenged Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina on the question of why voters should send someone with “no political experience” to the Oval Office.

Wallace brought up Fiorina’s criticisms of Hillary Clinton––namely her calling Clinton a personification of the professional political class––and pressed her on the matter.

“Isn’t it as questionable,” Wallace asked, “to take someone with no political experience and make them President of the United States as it is to take a politician without business experience and make them the head of a Fortune 100 company like Hewlett-Packard?”

Fiorina argued that the U.S. government was always intended to be a “citizen government” and told Wallace it’s “not accurate to say that I don’t know anything about politics.” She touted her advisory role to multiple politicians, her failed 2010 Senate campaign, and how she’s “been in and around government for a long time” as examples.

Watch the full interview below, via Fox:


...................................................................................................................................................................