To Participate on Thurstonblog

email yyyyyyyyyy58@gmail.com, provide profile information and we'll email your electronic membership


Sunday, November 13, 2016

"... perhaps the biggest electoral divide of all is the one that separates those in the conversation and those who are not. It’s a form of political segregation ..."

...................................................................................................................................................................
COMMENTS: 
*  You know, for the 100,000,000 Americans who didn't vote, trump is as much your fault as it is republicans.
*  That's poor logic. Let's look at California. If every eligible voter in California who didn't vote voted for Hillary .... Trump would have still won, and the results wouldn't have been one electoral vote closer. The same thing is true in every state Hillary carried, and is likely true in many states that Trump carried. You could say that people who didn't vote, and would have voted Hillary, but didn't vote in North Carolina, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Florida ... those folks might be partially to blame. I could get on board with that.  Some of those non-voters you are blaming were purposefully given a much harder time to vote in places like Wisconsin and North Carolina where there were confirmed cases of voter restriction taking place (and likely Arizona).  I'd just be careful about throwing aroungd blame ... that's an easy way to turn people off to your cause.
*  Yet another reason Bernie would have won this easily. He actually inspired non-voters. When he was no longer an option, they gave up on the idea of voting. They're not going to give up their free time to engage in politics when its over someone they don't trust (which was true on both sides of the aisle this cycle).
    *  I'm a non-voter, and Bernie did nothing for me. He was different, but at no point did he have particulars on how he was going to make these changes. Trump was the worst of all possible worlds, and if my state was even close, I would have voted, but that aside, until a candidate comes along and has a real plan to do real good, then the candidates are unworthy of my vote.
*  I think the broader question needs to be asked here. Why do people not register? Well you could say they already know they are disenfranchised. They already know that if they live in a red state, it is pointless for them to vote as they are in the group most likely to blue, but thanks to the electoral college system their vote is a waste of time and gas money (something they can I'll afford)
*   The 100,000,000 that did't vote are waiting for a party that expresses their desires.
...................................................................................................................................................................
Uncounted Nation — 100 Million ‘Missing’ Votes
By Doug Levitt, November 13, 2016

The unspoken margin of error in this election is an astonishing minus-100 million Americans.

That’s the number of our citizens who were eligible to vote but didn’t, either because they weren’t registered, or didn’t/don’t vote. As a group, that’s larger than the populations of more than 180 countries. This uncounted nation of our citizens have largely felt their voices devalued in a ceaseless cycle of disenfranchisement and disengagement.

Over the last six weeks, I traveled by Greyhound through ten swing states as part of a voter registration and get-out-the-vote tour of under-reflected communities — from a Latino church in Phoenix, to a point of water distribution in Flint, Michigan, to shelters in Cleveland, to Miami on election day, through tiny towns and on the Greyhound itself (part of a 120,000-Greyhound-mile project, aiming to shed light on those struggling to get by).

What I found was that, after a campaign season defined by appeals to our lowest common dividers, perhaps the biggest electoral divide of all is the one that separates those in the conversation and those who are not. It’s a form of political segregation (based mostly on class, as voter participation is directly proportional to income). Don’t vote, don’t count. Don’t count, why listen?

For every citizen who said “Ya voté” with surety and an “I voted” sticker on was a person completely turned off by a fusilade of negativity. For every parishioner at the oldest African-American church in Milwaukee who said, “I’m on it” was a security officer on a double shift for whom politics seemed a world away, a spectator sport of, by, and for others.

The reflection gap — ravine — in our politics is not limited to the results on election day. It is found in every single TV story, article or blog post that makes mention of polls, as polling is limited to likely voters. (The only recent survey of those who don’t vote, by Pew in 2012, showed them more than twice as likely to vote for Obama than Romney.)

Any search for the roots of our political disparity doesn’t have to go further than the US History page on Wikipedia. We were founded as a democracy entirely in favor of the haves and really haves over the have-far-lesses — from the vote being the sole right of property owners, and then only white men, through poll taxes that ended 52 years ago, to new restrictive voter ID laws (when 1-in-4 African-Americans lack government-issued ID).

What’s desperately needed to fix this distorted mirror of our elections is a civic “army,” a loosely affiliated volunteer Civic Corps — both partisan and non-partisan — to engage those on every corner, down every back road, in a dialogue that will repair the breach, and help reflect the silent 100 million who went unheard in this pivotal election.

Their voices and their votes amount to the growth potential of our people, which the survival of our democracy demands.
...................................................................................................................................................................

No comments: