What we have now is political theater
But it’s not what we could and should have. Here’s how you can play your part.
By Tom Horner and Tim Penny, December 28, 2013
In
the musical “Chicago,” attorney Billy Flynn tells his guilty
client that juries are swayed by entertainment, not facts. “Give
’em the old flimflam flummox. Fool and fracture ’em,” sings
Billy.
Billy
at least earned his pay when he razzle-dazzled the jury into
acquitting Roxie Hart.
The
same can’t be said for our national lawmakers. Only in Washington
can you get paid for not doing your job. Most policymakers were busy
in 2013 doing, well, nothing other than giving us the old flimflam
flummox.
Consider
the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare. Republicans have made the ACA
a referendum on the competence of President Obama. For their part,
congressional Democrats distract us with the false claim that the GOP
is playing politics and have no health solutions of their own.
Meanwhile, Democrats stand mostly silent when President Obama
announces delays and waivers while simultaneously threatening to veto
any legislation designed to do the same thing.
Both
sides ignore the real question they should be asking: “What’s
next?” With or without the ACA, the cost of health care is
unsustainable, especially in an aging society. And, sadly, the real
solutions aren’t easy. More competition among insurers, as
Republicans argue, or more government intervention, as Democrats
propose, offer little, if any, relief on costs. What we need instead
of a flimflam debate is an honest dialogue about steps that would
achieve cost savings.
Reducing
the cost of care for chronic illnesses by promoting prevention;
paying only for procedures that are proven to work, and cutting back
on the obscene amounts of money spent in the last weeks and months of
our lives are just the beginning of the steps that will ultimately be
needed. The longer we are distracted by political razzle-dazzle,
though, the more intractable the cost challenge becomes.
It
seems our national legislative bodies simply aren’t equal to the
task of substantive consideration of controlling health costs or any
issue, from welfare reform to tax policy to immigration. Most agree
on that much. In fact, the only real mystery in the 10 percent
approval rating Congress has among voters is who are the one in 10
people who think Congress is doing a good job?
Republicans
and Democrats blame partisan politics for Congress’ failures. But,
like vampires, they don’t see their own images when they walk past
mirrors. Without a trace of irony, politicians from both parties say
they want to work across the aisle, but it’s the other side that
won’t work with them. Fool and fracture ’em.
Yes,
Congress is broken. But upending the basic rules as Democrats did
when they exercised the so-called “nuclear option” to allow some
presidential nominees to be approved without the threat of
filibusters ignores the real problems plaguing Congress. The
ever-growing rivers of money flowing through politics; members who
never stop campaigning, and redistricting that creates too many safe
congressional seats are among the many significant — and ignored —
contributors to the breakdown of Congress.
We
citizens can stand by and watch public policy being treated like bad
entertainment, or we can take action. Here are a few suggested New
Year’s Resolutions.
• Resolve
to be more open to the thought that the other side may have a
legitimate point of view. That means listening to interest groups
with a skeptical ear. Interest groups are designed to promote a
position and too often do so in inflammatory ways. Seldom do they
advocate a middle ground. Yet, most solutions are not found on the
extremes.
• Resolve
to question your own legislators. Challenge them to prove that they
are able to meet the other side partway. Hard-core partisanship leads
to gridlock. Look for evidence that your legislator understands that
sometimes half a loaf is better than no loaf at all.
• Resolve
to be more civil in your personal approach to politics — and be
consistent in demanding that candidates keep it clean. Too often we
only object to negative campaigning when it is coming from those on
the other side of the political aisle or issue. We need to also be
willing to criticize candidates we otherwise support when they cross
the line into incivility.
• Finally,
resolve to donate time and money only to candidates who demonstrate
that they can be part of the solution — and, in November, vote
accordingly. Maybe then we will elect a Congress that earns its pay
by engaging in serious policy work instead of rhetorical
razzle-dazzle.
...................................................................................................................................................................
No comments:
Post a Comment