To Participate on Thurstonblog

email yyyyyyyyyy58@gmail.com, provide profile information and we'll email your electronic membership


Sunday, February 14, 2016

And as long as politicians continue to spin their tales, fact checkers will be necessary because we just can't let the pols get away with lying.

...................................................................................................................................................................
COMMENTS: 
*  Plenty of job security for this guy.
*  It is sad that politicians believe Americans will swallow their crap hook, line, and sinker.  It is even sadder that the politicians  are correct in their belief.  We the people get what we vote for, and deserve what we get.   There are no statesmen willing to lead in this quagmire American politics has begun.  Can't say as I blame them, mom told me if I played with doo doo I would get it on my hands.
*  99.9% of politicians are just fast talking CON men and women. If they weren't on the stump, and trying to beguile the public into voting them into the cushy overpaid jobs they have.. They would be doing the easiest kind of sales work out in the private sector they could.  Or looking for elderly lonely people to cheat out of their life savings..  They are mostly the dirtiest people in the USA..  A rare few anymore, CARE.. OR seem to care.  The job is just a lazy man  or woman, with a sense of entitlement's…Dream.  Talk their way in, shmooze around while they are .. Wink, nod and lie..  Then laugh their a**'s off at the STUPID people that believe them, while hob knobbing with the real people who tell them what to do..  The rich 1%…  One giant scam…Thats what politics is.
*  In running this story, CBS has no excuse if moderators fail to challenge repeat offenses during the debate.  They should have printouts of the collected statements of each candidate and should challenge candidates who try to turn lie into truth by sheer repetition.  The majority of viewers do not turn to the fact check sites the next morning.  They form their opinions on what is said during the debate.
    *  True.  Low information voters are the reason these clowns get back in.. They are too busy thinking nothing will change..   But the wrong bunch in office and thier lives can do more than change.. As we saw during the bush years..   Lives can be turned upside down, inside out and NEVER recover..
...................................................................................................................................................................
Fact checker: "As long as politicians open their mouths, I'll have a job"
February 13, 2016

You can expect presidential candidates to make a lot of claims during the CBS News Republican debate in South Carolina Saturday night, but some just might not be true. Reporters are supposed to make sure of their facts as a matter of course, but this campaign has seen a growing army of political fact checkers who are expected to explain how they checked what candidates say.

The winter of 2016 may well be remembered for a blizzard, but not of snow. Squalls of spin have socked voters across the land, reports CBS News' Mark Albert. It's been a flurry of promises and pledges, broadsides and bombast -- all delivered with the gusto of a nor'easter.

The gale-force one-liners can be nauseating as presidential candidates try to cajole and convince voters. So how do you know what's true and what's not?

Like a lighthouse in the storm, Glenn Kessler tries to cut through the fog of facts as the columnist for The Washington Post's Fact Checker. Business these days is better than ever, he said. Kessler and colleague Michelle Lee assign one to four Pinocchios, using the beloved children's character whose nose grew when he didn't tell the truth.

But Kessler doesn't type the L-word.

"I never use the word 'lie.' I can't get into a politician's head," Kessler said.

But he has chastised politicians with other words: "false," "dubious," "statistical mendacity," "debunk," "no evidence," "deeply flawed," "wildly inflated," "wildly mischaracterized," "bizarre claim," "inaccurate" and "misleading."

"Yes, I plead guilty to using those words," Kessler said, laughing.

Their thesaurus was well-worn in 2015.

No party was spared. Donald Trump earned the most Pinocchios. In fact, Kessler wrote, "Frankly, it's really not interesting to fact check the Donald, as his assertions are so easily debunked."

"I saw people getting together and, in fairly large numbers, celebrating as the World Trade Center was coming down," Trump said at a rally in November. Kessler went on to debunk that claim.

Also on the list of their biggest Pinocchios of 2015: President Obama.

"The Keystone is for Canadian oil, to send that down to the Gulf. It bypasses the the United States," Mr. Obama said in February 2015. Kessler in turn pointed out the "overinflated rhetoric" that surrounded the pipeline debate.

Politicians are paying attention.

"Senator, the fact checkers say you're wrong," Chris Wallace said to GOP candidate Ted Cruz on "Fox News Sunday" in January in response to Cruz's claim that Obamacare has been the biggest job killer in the U.S.

"Chris, the media fact checkers are not fair and impartial. They are liberal editorial journalists. And they have made it their mission to defend Obamacare," Cruz responded.

"There's certainly no question that more people have jobs and more people health insurance," Wallace pointed out.

"Yes, there is question," Cruz said.

Kessler said politicians or their staffs even try to negotiate a better rating. But some just blink.

"I actually got calls from Sen. Rob Portman and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who said that they, because of my fact checks, they were going to be much more careful in the future," Kessler said.

If the number of claims has exploded, so too have the number of fact checkers.

At least 80 "active" fact checking sites now span the globe, according to the Duke Reporters' Lab, which in January helped launch an archive of U.S. political TV ads waiting to be vetted.

The Pulitzer Prize-winning Politifact.com has its own rating system with "Pants on Fire!" and Politico has a "Wrongometer."

FactCheck.org doesn't have a rating system, but they call politicians out in a contextual way.

"We just tell readers this is misleading and this is why," FactCheck.org deputy managing editor Rob Farley said.

"We're advocating for truth in politics and for getting the voters the best information they can get," Farley added. "And so we want them to be armed when they go to the ballot box with the facts."

Based in Philadelphia, the nonpartisan, non-profit FactCheck.org has a team of six staffers, led by Eugene Kiely. On the day CBS News visited him, we found him fact checking a Ted Cruz TV ad, which he said was not true.

"So I'm just trying to piece together the information that I need to show here's what really happened," Kiely said.

The team posted its analysis the next day.

But even fact checkers are not all-knowing.

Just this week, Politifact revised a headline on a fact check after pushback from a presidential campaign, writing its original wording "should have been more precise."

Kiely at FactCheck.org said the sheer number of candidates -- and claims -- this cycle has been "overwhelming." He said 2016 will be more of the same.

"But it's good for us in terms of being able to provide information to the public," Kiely said.

That's why, just like a weather forecaster in winter, the Post's Kessler predicts fact checkers will never be out of season.

"I think as long as politicians open their mouths, I'll have a job," Kessler said.
...................................................................................................................................................................

No comments: