COMMENTS:
* Palin is not difficult to understand. Like any demagogue, she plays to the fear, ignorance and hatred of her followers.
* Isn't it possible that Ms. Palin is simply following the practice of many politicians of verbalizing a stream of consciousness? It's consistent with Mr. Trump's apparent aversion to speaking in full sentences, instead spewing catch phrases of a few words, repeated almost endlessly. This is politics in the twenty-first century, reflecting the view that voters don't understand grammatically expressed concepts.
* Maybe we should all agree that she has invented a new language and call it Lipstick on a Pig Latin.
* I think Sarah tries desperately to sound knowledgeable and sophisticated and the result is part amusing and part pitiful. I've often wondered how many in her audiences understand any of it.
* Palin is the revenge of the D students.
* Oh, thank you. This has been my first good laugh over all this Trump campaign nonsense; up until now nothing but flat dismay. Excellent Palin translation indeed!
* Sarah is to eloquence what Trump is to humility.
...................................................................................................................................................................
Sarah Palin’s English
By Anna North, February 2, 2016
Sarah Palin has been mocked a lot for the way she talks, especially in her strange and rambling endorsement speech for Donald Trump. But her speeches on the campaign trail aren’t simple; they are actually incredibly complicated.
Her unusual style was on display at a Trump rally on Monday afternoon in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. “When both parties, the machines involved, when both of them hate you,” she said at one point, “then you know America loves you and we do love he who will be the next president of the United States of America, Donald J. Trump!”
Let’s break that last part down: “We” love not just Donald Trump, or even just Donald J. Trump, but “he who will be the next president of the United States of America.”
Mrs. Palin relies heavily on this particular kind of dependent clause. “He is one who would know to negotiate,” she said of Donald Trump in her speech endorsing him on Jan. 19. Later in that speech, she spoke of “our own G.O.P. machine, the establishment, they who would assemble the political landscape.”
Mrs. Palin is also a big fan of the participial phrase. “And that blank check too,” she said on Monday, “making no sense because it’s led us to things, oh gosh, to pay the bills then, we have had to uh, print money out of thin air.”
In this case “making no sense” and everything that follows appear to modify “blank check”; though it can be a little hard to tell with Mrs. Palin, the participial phrase seems to function as an adjective. Elsewhere in her speech Mrs. Palin got more sophisticated.
“Politics being kind of brutal business,” she said, “you find out who your friends are, that’s for sure.”
Here, “politics being kind of brutal business” defines the circumstances under which the action occurs. It looks like a construction that will be familiar to anybody who took Latin in school: the ablative absolute.
An ablative absolute in Latin is a particular kind of clause that, according to one definition, “modifies the whole sentence as an adverb modifies the action of a verb.” An example, courtesy of The Latin Library: “His verbis dictis, Caesar discedit.” Translation: “With these words having been said, Caesar departs.”
In fact, a lot of what Sarah Palin says sounds like it’s been poorly translated from the Latin. With her “he who” and “one who,” she’d sound almost Ciceronian if it weren’t for the holes in her logic and the way those complicated sentences sometimes dribble off into vaguely sinister, possibly offensive nonsense.
Maybe Mrs. Palin or her speechwriters think the convoluted sentence structure makes her sound smart. Maybe they think it makes her sound heroic, like the orators of the past. Or maybe all those extra clauses are just a really good way to load up a sentence with praise — or insults. Here’s Mrs. Palin using both a dependent clause and a participial phrase to attack President Obama on Jan. 19:
And he, who would negotiate deals, kind of with the skills of a community organizer maybe organizing a neighborhood tea, well, he deciding that, “No, America would apologize as part of the deal,” as the enemy sends a message to the rest of the world that they capture and we kowtow, and we apologize, and then, we bend over and say, “Thank you, enemy.”I honestly am not sure what’s going on in this sentence. What I do know is that Sarah Palin has this in common with Roman orators: She loves to talk trash.
...................................................................................................................................................................
No comments:
Post a Comment