glenn  Today 08:40 AM |
"Police were investigating whether the garage was used as a so-called chop shop, where stolen vehicles were stripped down and their parts sold"? I guess that the investigation and subsequent warrant and the stolen cars and the parts would indicate that an investigation isn't necessary.
"Well Barney, it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, flies like duck, has duck feet, a duck bill and migrates every year! Yep - it's a possum!
"Well Barney, it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, flies like duck, has duck feet, a duck bill and migrates every year! Yep - it's a possum!
 | Tumwatergirl Today 10:04 AM in reply to glenn |
Ahh, but there are all kinds of "shapes" and some are not so appealing.
Besides, when you read an article in this paper, you have to take how Jeremy Pawloski writes the story.......he does not have a way with words, but a way with saying things that make the story very confusing to say the least.
Besides, when you read an article in this paper, you have to take how Jeremy Pawloski writes the story.......he does not have a way with words, but a way with saying things that make the story very confusing to say the least.
| ALocalGuy Today 01:00 PM in reply to glenn |
We noticed the attempts.
Do you understand anything glenn? I mean some of the comments you make on here just make no sense at all. The cars may be reported stolen but that doesn't mean anything. The cops have to assume innocence until they complete the investigation. Until it is completed this is considered what we like to call evidence. Now stick with me because I know for someone like you it might be hard to understand. Evidence may not be worth anything if this alleged (notice I used the word alleged) chop shop was unaware that these vehicles were reported missing. For instance the defense in court might say they believed they bought the cars legally. If that is the case then they might be able to get off. So in order to ensure that the courts do not waste there time, it is the duty of our police officers to investigate that way the courts don't realize all the little details later. In our country one is innocent until proven guilty, and not the other way around. They have to prove that they either stole the vehicles, or purchased these vehicles knowing they were stolen, and then must prove that they were selling them off in parts. Just because they have the physical pieces doesnt mean anything. Just because they have parts doesnt mean anything until they have proof. For instance if you have a gun and someone gets shot, they can't just assume it was you and put you in jail. They have to come up with a case genius.
To answer the first sentence of your comment, the answer is "no." |
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
No comments:
Post a Comment