***********************************
***********************************
Selected Comments on LTEs, 2010 June 23
*****************************************************
eieio wrote on 06/23/2010 10:02:27 AM:
LPH - I hope you weren't referring to my comment (09:46:59 am). Ken Michael sounds like he was sincerely expressing some valid concerns. My comment was a simple statement of fact relevant to a point the letter writer was making.
******************************************************
radec wrote on 06/23/2010 09:18:56 AM:
radec's comment is abusive and has been removed.
******************************************************
radec wrote on 06/23/2010 09:20:35 AM:
radec's comment is abusive and has been removed.
******************************************************
radec wrote on 06/23/2010 09:43:13 AM:
radec's comment is abusive and has been removed.
******************************************************
LPH98512 wrote on 06/23/2010 10:07:05 AM:
eieio - I am referring only to the attempt to smear me, issued by radec.
As to your statement to Michael - I agree.
******************************************************
LPH98512 wrote on 06/23/2010 10:19:55 AM:
"radec wrote on 06/23/2010 09:18:56 AM:
Larry Hill doesn't even live in the 22nd District yet he seems to know what's best for us that do."
Actually, the letter writer said "His continuous service in the Legislature speaks for the trust instilled in him by his constituents."
Misrepresentation of fact is what the letter is all about. It would seem the comments support the letter writer's contention.
radec wrote on 06/23/2010 12:19:21 PM:
Yes I believe Sam Hunt is an extremist. Anyone who votes to suspend a voter approved initiative in order to further burden citizens with higher taxes is an extremist.
And if you are going to call someone a "moron" the proper spelling is m-o-r-o-n, not moran.
xyzxy wrote on 06/23/2010 12:42:12 PM:
radec, the definition of extreme is not "radec disagrees"
TheLonius wrote on 06/23/2010 01:01:18 PM:
" LPH98512 wrote on 06/23/2010 10:19:55 AM:
"radec wrote on 06/23/2010 09:18:56 AM:
Larry Hill doesn't even live in the 22nd District yet he seems to know what's best for us that do."
Actually, the letter writer said "His continuous service in the Legislature speaks for the trust instilled in him by his constituents."
Misrepresentation of fact is what the letter is all about. It would seem the comments support the letter writer's contention."
If "LPH98512" is "Larry Hill", Red Foreman's comment is an attack as well.
Larry Hill never mentioned Justin Kover. Maybe what Red Foreman is saying is that Justin Kover attacked Sam Hunt, as per the analogy in Larry Hill's letter. Maybe Red Foreman can explain where he comes to a conclusion with nothing to support his claim.
And in either case, it appears that radec is avoiding my question of residency, but saying others should have no say due to lack of residency.
x wrote on 06/23/2010 01:58:53 PM:
TheLonius wrote on 06/23/2010 01:01:18 PM:
If "LPH98512" is "Larry Hill", Red Foreman's comment is an attack as well.
I would say it's an "observation," based on what many of us have seen here on the various comment sections. It's also his personal opinion, just as you've expressed your personal opinion. MY personal opinion is that it doesn't qualify as an "attack."
IndependentVoter wrote on 06/23/2010 07:00:16 PM:
IndependentVoter's comment is abusive and has been removed.
Larry,
I knew we could depend on you to support your friends.
IndependentVoter wrote on 06/23/2010 09:03:09 PM:
IndependentVoter's comment is abusive and has been removed.
2 comments:
Thank you, my clandestine friend!
It's nice to have an archive of Olympian comments since they changed software and didn't retain the comments under Pluck.
As demonstrated, radec not only misrepresented issues about me on June 23, but yesterday as well.
This is particularily funny as I reflect on that day:
"radec wrote on 06/23/2010 09:18:56 AM:
Larry Hill doesn't even live in the 22nd District yet he seems to know what's best for us that do."
Is the 22nd so far removed from the rest of Thurston County that those of us in neighboring districts can't see the forest for the trees?
Maybe it's an island.
Post a Comment