Oh snap! Engal=Fail.
Friendorfoe wrote on 01/25/2010 05:06:32 PM:
misspell Engel=Fail
Friendorfoe wrote on 01/25/2010 05:07:08 PM:
It's so much fun...Engel=FAIL
Good on ya, Fof!
UPDATE:
OlyKay wrote on 01/25/2010 05:28:02 PM:
Actually, Friendorfoe, it's ENGEL. So you can do it again!
Yeah... what she said! LOL
4 comments:
ENGEL was taking that familiar “superior perspective” position and rushed to judgment on sparkle. I followed the referenced debate/conversation between sparkle and abc and felt that I could speak to the validity of Engel’s comment. My summation: Engel=Fail
I'm laughing at The Olympian saying "that person was permanently banned".
The O should be saying that an "ID" was banned, not that a person was banned. According to their own words, they don't bother to try tracking down any culprit with an eye to banning all instances of the culprit's IDs.
Computers have a unique identifier. Can't a certain computer be banned? Then again, the O could like the action-advertisement revenue based on site hits. The socks represent a small economic stimulus of their own!
Post a Comment